CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Policy

2009 SYMPOSIUM
INTERFERENCE
Wireless Innovation, Public Interest, Regulatory Response
organized by
Commlaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Policy
and the Institute for Communications Law Studies at
The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law
in association with the
Federal Communications Bar Association


Thursday, February 26, 2009

Full Schedule

Registration Form


Consumers increasingly are relying on their mobile devices and wireless providers for broadband access, streaming content, and mobile computing. The 2009 Symposium presents a discussion of the crossroads of the various interests and forces in the wireless industry: consumers, the public interest, innovators, operators, and regulators. The nexus of these interests and forces is orbited by a variety of issues.

The 700 MHz auction of spring 2008 brought hope for more open wireless networks, rural broadband, and robust wireless services for public safety. Debate rages over the proper use and means of assignment of the AWS-3 spectrum--exclusive licensing, or license free. The bases of all of these issues also have international implications. Additionally, each of these issues and forces is impacted by innovation in consumer equipment and network design, as well as policy set by Congress and the FCC.

Policymakers have sought to balance the need to encourage innovation and the deployment of new, better services with the need to protect consumers. In February 2009, Congress moved back the "hard date" for the DTV transition to ensure that all consumers seeking a subsided converter box received one. In 2008 the FCC auctioned pieces of the 700 MHz spectrum with mandatory open access obligations. In the interest of spurring rural wireless broadband, the FCC began proceedings to allow the operation of devices in television white spaces, despite complaints of interference from broadcasters and wireless microphone manufacturers. Many issues, however, still remain. How should the D-Block be assigned? Will consumers be left without television service following the DTV transition? How will advanced broadband wireless be harmonized on an international level? Should devices be allowed to operate in television white spaces?

On balance, the question remains: What is the appropriate regulatory response to increasing innovation in the provision of wireless services and development of wireless devices, balanced against the public or consumer interest?


CommLaw Conspectus Suite 248, The Catholic University Of America, Columbus School of Law, Washington, D.C. 20064


Last Revised 23-Feb-09 07:28 PM.